What does districtisation mean?

    It means that services council provides are rated at the district rather than ward level, meaning that we all pay an equal share across our district.

    What is driving the move towards a district approach?

    • District-level funding represents an opportunity to plan, fund and deliver services with a district-wide perspective.
    • The cost of activities would be charged at a similar rate across the district. This could help address the challenge for less populated wards to maintain services given the low number of ratepayers to share the costs  

    What services and activities are currently delivered using a district approach and which are currently delivered using a ward approach?

    Currently all services and activities, with the exception of community facilities, parks, pools and community and promotions grants are delivered using a district approach.   This conversation is about whether Council-owned property, parks, pools and museums should continue to be delivered using a ward rates or if those services and activities should be changed to a district-wide rate.      

    What affect does this district approach have on delivery of services throughout the district?

    The districtisation project is looking at how things are funded rather than the level of service provided, per se. This is because Council reviews Levels of Service across all activities every three years, as part of the Long-term Plan development process. Council will be having a discussion with the community early next year regarding what services we could do without or reduce during the development of the 2025-34 Long-term Plan, to ensure our services are both affordable and fit for the future. Any proposed changes will be separately consulted on at this time.

    What would happen to ward reserve accounts?

    All wards have reserves accounts, some of these are in surplus and some have negative balances. Cromwell has overall a positive balance over $20 million, which will be largely expended in the next couple of years by funding the development of the new hall. This funding is already earmarked and will not be affected by a decision to further districtise activities. 

    Once the money for Cromwell is spent, the wards will have relatively similar reserve levels and under the proposal to further districtise activities these could be amalgamated. Alternatively, Council could choose to retain some of these reserve accounts for targeted future use.

    Will this have an impact on rates in each ward?

    In the below modelling, parks, pools, community facilities and museum funding has been included. Community grants (bar museum and pool grants) and promotions grants have been excluded. Two options are modelled:

     Option 1: Every ward pays an equal share of Council-owned property, pools, parks, cemeteries and museum activities ($837 each). 

    Average impact per rating unit each LTP year

    Ward

    Status Quo

    Districtisation

    Variance

    Cromwell

    $889

    $837

    -$52

    Maniototo

    $947

    $837

    -$110

    Teviot Valley

    $604

    $837

    $233

    Vincent

    $799

    $837

    $38

     

    Drivers of the changes for each community board

    Maniototo - has six community halls in need of significant earthquake strengthening work.  The cost of this (and all similar strengthening across the district) would be shared by the whole district. Whether all these buildings will remain on the schedule for earthquake strengthening is a future decision. 

    Cromwell – development of the new Cromwell Memorial Hall will be paid for with land and assets from within the Cromwell ward. However, if districtisation does occur, future operating costs would be shared by the whole district.     

    Vincent - increase is due to supporting the operating costs for the Cromwell Hall and the earthquake strengthening costs of the halls in the Maniototo ward.          

    Teviot Valley - additional charge is primarily due to the Teviot Valley sharing the cost of running the Council-administered Maniototo, Alexandra and Cromwell pools if districtisation goes ahead. A question for future discussion may be whether district ratepayers could also share the cost of maintenance, operation, and depreciation of the Roxburgh community pool.  

    Option 2: Every ward pays an equal share of Council-owned property, cemeteries, and museum activities and an adjustment is made for Teviot Valley ratepayers who do not have a council run pool (so the pool costs are still districtised across the other three wards but Teviot Valley receives a differential to account for this).

    Average impact per rating unit each LTP year

    Ward

    Status Quo

    Districtisation

    Variance

    Cromwell

    $889

    $854

    -$35

    Maniototo

    $947

    $854

    -$93

    Teviot Valley

    $604

    $645

    $41

    Vincent

    $799

    $854

    $55


    Under this option Cromwell and Maniototo ratepayers will have a net benefit, but this is reduced because Teviot ratepayers are not subsidising pool costs. The net result for Vincent is a slight increase from option 1 for the same reason, and for Teviot ratepayers there is still a slight increase from status quo, but it’s significantly reduced from Option 1.

    Option 3: Status quo, no change. Property, parks, cemeteries, pools and museums continue to be funded by ward rates.

    I have a specific question that is not covered in the consultation document or the FAQs. How can I get an answer?

    Please email districtisation@codc.govt.nz and you will receive a response.


    Will shifting to a district approach save ratepayers money?

    There will not be significant ratepayer savings as a result of a shift to a district approach.   Some wards may experience a slight decrease in rates, while others may experience a slight increase in rates.  The main driver for rates increases is water, wastewater, stormwater and roading, which will not change.  

    What impact will this have on Council land?

    All land is currently held by Council as a whole, and under the Local Government Act 2002 community boards cannot hold land. Council has historically allowed land to be managed at the ward level, with proceeds from land sales often being allocated to activities within the particular ward. 

    Endowment land is land that has been vested in Council, to be used for a specific purpose. Any proceeds from the sale of endowment land must also be used for the purpose of the endowment – for example, if the land was donated for the betterment of the local borough, the proceeds must be used in the area that was intended in the original endowment. This requirement will not change under districtisation. 

    Any freehold land could be sold and used to fund any activity across the four wards, as is intended by the Local Government Act 2002. 

    Council has a significant amount of reserve land which is subject to the provisions of the Reserves Act 1977 and any sale of this land follows the process under this Act.

     

    How will a district approach impact museums?

    Council-owned buildings occupied by community museums would be funded and managed at a district level under the One District: Central Otago proposal. In addition, grant funding allocated to regular museum recipients such as the Cromwell, Alexandra and Maniototo Early Settlers Museums would be allocated from a district rather than ward rate, and distributed by Council rather than respective community boards, as is the current practice.

    What are the options being considered?

    Option 1: Full districtisation of property, parks, cemeteries, pools and museums. 

    Option 2: Districtise property, parks, cemeteries, pools and museums, but include a rating adjustment for the Teviot Valley Ward to offset pool charges. 

    Option 3: Status quo, no change. Property, parks, cemeteries, pools and museums continue to be funded by ward rates.  

    If Council approves districtisation, when would the change come into effect?

    The effective date would be 1 July 2025 and subject to successful adoption of the 2025-2034 Long-term Plan. 

Community boards

    What are community board members responsible for currently?

    The role of community boards is established by legislation (section 52 of the Local Government Act 2002).  Their current powers include:   

    • The power to determine appropriate road works programmes, provided that the works are funded from the community board’s own resources. 
    • Provision, maintenance and upgrading of parks, reserves (including reserve naming), public recreational facilities, cemeteries, community centres and public halls.
    • The provision and maintenance of such other works, facilities, and amenities in the community boards’ ward(s) as the board sees fit in line with Council policy and the purpose statement of local government
    • Monitor and take such action as necessary to ensure the adequacy of traffic activity (including temporary road closures, naming of streets and so on) in line with Council policy.
    • Negotiate the acquisition and disposal of Council property within the community board’s jurisdiction, subject to any property transactions being formally approved by the Council.
    • Recommendation to Council of fees and charges relating to ward services.

    How is the role of community boards proposed to change in the future?

    Community boards will remain as a strong link between our local areas and the Council. Their role, which is enshrined in legislation, is to represent and act as advocates for the interests of their community, to maintain an overview of the services provided by Council, and to consider and report on matters that are referred by Council or of interest to the board. 

    Community boards are working with Council staff to determine what roles and connections they would have, if districtisation goes ahead.

     Roles for community boards that may be discussed as part of the district approach include:

    • Develop relationships and communicate with key organisations, special interest groups, community members and businesses
    • Update Council on Community Board matters and community issues via the chair updates (on rotation)
    • Make submissions to Council on matters relating to the ward (such as the Annual Plan and and Long-term Plan processes) – currently confined to ward-based delegations; could include all Council functions relating to their ward
    • Monitor the services Council provides in the ward and how these services meet the needs of the community
    • Encourage public participation/involvement in meetings; initiate and attend informal public sessions (these could occur alongside other community events) 
    • Act as a liaison on key projects/ council activities
    • Undertake elected member training, to further develop their skills, and progress to take on roles on other committees/panels. 
    • Clarify and promote the role of the community board in the ward and wider communities.
    • Take interest in Council meetings/workshops and have an understanding of decision making at Council level.
    • Attend community events, meetings and groups where possible within their ward and district. 

     

    How will the community board interact with Council? What formal mechanisms will allow this interaction?

    Community Board chairs now have a regular slot to discuss at Council any issues within their district.

     Feedback from community boards clearly indicate that there needs to be a partnership between Council and community boards and what this looks like in practice will need to evolve.

    How will the Council appointed to each community board be selected?

    Council decides on the appointment at the first meeting after the election. In the past, the councillor with the highest number of votes in the ward was selected to join the community board.  

    Is the community board structure part of this discussion?

    No.  This was determined by the recent Representation Review process (adopted by Council 29 May 2024).